_edited.png)
Global Conflict
Architects
00
00
$0.00 raised of $0.00 goal
Users get 3 votes to give out per competition.
Success Message
Failuer Message
Livestream
Location
City:
State:
Country:
School or Organization:
Kansas City Metro
Missouri
United States
Competition Brief
About
The Architects: Global Conflict: Allan D, Grant E
Problem
Our subject matter expert, Mark Adams, the educational director of Truman Library, challenged us to determine whether or not increasing global awareness leads to an increase in global conflict.
Solution
We researched the United States' role in causing the current Ukranian war and we are creating a website that compares and contrasts our relations with Russia since WWI. We are also making a series of maps that will show the Russian boundaries and how over time, they went from allies to enemies.
Audience | Target Market
Learning Outcomes | Community Impact
Our audience will learn about the relationship between Russia and the US over the years.
Next Steps
We still need to complete the website.
Reflection | Other Info
We've worked really well together. WE've been challenged with only having two people on our team and we've challenged ourselves to do more work.
Resource | Support Needs
We only ask that people attend our showcase on June 29 from 9:30-10:30 and 12:00-1:00. Business partners interested in working with our students on future projects, please contact our Director of Community Partnerships, Jake Wingo, at jake.wingo@raypec.org.
Special message...
Comments
From our partners.
New Comment
Thanks for your submission. Your comment is awaiting approval from the educator
Comments
---
4/12/25, 9:10 PM
Comments
---
4/12/25, 8:54 PM
Comments
---
4/12/25, 7:37 PM
Comments
---
4/12/25, 6:55 PM
Comments
---
4/12/25, 6:54 PM
Comments
---
4/12/25, 6:46 PM
Comments
---
4/12/25, 6:44 PM
Comments
---
4/12/25, 6:39 PM
Comments
---
4/12/25, 6:25 PM
Comments
---
4/12/25, 12:48 PM
Comments
---
4/7/25, 3:10 PM
Comments
---
4/4/25, 4:54 PM
Community comments coming soon!
Want to comment or judge submissions?
Partner today!
Judge Access
Criteria One:
1- Did not do
2- Little evidence
3- Some requirements met
4- Most requirements met
5- All requirements met
Criteria Two:
1- Did not do
2- Little evidence
3- Some requirements met
4- Most requirements met
5- All requirements met
Criteria Three:
1- Did not do
2- Little evidence
3- Some requirements met
4- Most requirements met
5- All requirements met
Criteria Four:
1- Did not do
2- Little evidence
3- Some requirements met
4- Most requirements met
5- All requirements met
Criteria Five:
1- Did not do
2- Little evidence
3- Some requirements met
4- Most requirements met
5- All requirements met
Total Rating:
1
Thanks for contributing to the growth of young innovators!