top of page
View All Pitches
Global Conflict

Architects

00
00
$0.00 raised of $0.00 goal

Users get 3 votes to give out per competition.

Success Message

Failuer Message

Livestream
Location

Kansas City Metro

Missouri

United States

​

City:

State:

Country:

School or Organization:

Competition Brief

​

About

The Architects: Global Conflict: Allan D, Grant E

Problem

Our subject matter expert, Mark Adams, the educational director of Truman Library, challenged us to determine whether or not increasing global awareness leads to an increase in global conflict.

Solution

We researched the United States' role in causing the current Ukranian war and we are creating a website that compares and contrasts our relations with Russia since WWI. We are also making a series of maps that will show the Russian boundaries and how over time, they went from allies to enemies.

Audience | Target Market

​

Learning Outcomes  |  Community Impact

Our audience will learn about the relationship between Russia and the US over the years.

Next Steps

We still need to complete the website.

 Reflection  |  Other Info

We've worked really well together. WE've been challenged with only having two people on our team and we've challenged ourselves to do more work.

Resource  |  Support Needs

We only ask that people attend our showcase on June 29 from 9:30-10:30 and 12:00-1:00. Business partners interested in working with our students on future projects, please contact our Director of Community Partnerships, Jake Wingo, at jake.wingo@raypec.org.

Special message...
Architects
Comments

From our partners.

New Comment

Comment here

Thanks for your submission. Your comment is awaiting approval from the educator

Comments

---

7/24/25, 11:11 AM

Good Job

Comments

---

7/24/25, 10:39 AM

Great start with your pitch titled "teem"! Your creativity has potential, and refining your responses will enhance clarity. Consider exploring careers as a Marketing Specialist, Content Creator, or Business Development Manager. Pursuing fields like Communication Studies or Business Administration could further develop your skills. Keep working on expressing your ideas clearly, as this will strengthen your pitch and help you excel in these areas. Your dedication is promising, and continued effort will lead to success.

Comments

---

7/24/25, 9:35 AM

eruio

Comments

---

7/23/25, 2:10 PM

skjskdjk

Comments

---

7/23/25, 11:25 AM

nice

Comments

---

7/21/25, 4:03 PM

nice

Comments

---

7/21/25, 3:44 PM

Your exploration into usability testing is a great start. It’s important to identify problems and propose thoughtful solutions. Consider careers in UX design, software testing, or product management, which require skills in problem-solving and analysis. Further studies in computer science or human-computer interaction could enhance your expertise. Keep refining your approach and enjoy the learning process. Your enthusiasm is a valuable asset as you make adjustments and evaluate impacts.

Comments

---

7/20/25, 4:32 PM

Testing with 1.25 backer contribution.

Comments

---

7/19/25, 9:21 AM

Your pitch for "Teamm Ruchika" is creative and impactful. Focusing on making science resources accessible is a great initiative, and your enthusiasm for fun learning is infectious. Consider careers like Science Educator, Educational Content Developer, or Community Outreach Coordinator. Pursuing studies in Science Communication or Educational Technology could enhance your project. Keep gathering innovative ideas to engage science enthusiasts and ensure an enriching learning experience. Your passion for making learning enjoyable is commendable!

Comments

---

7/17/25, 5:40 AM

nice

Comments

---

7/16/25, 7:38 AM

Testing reject pitch function. Test only.

Comments

---

7/16/25, 5:06 AM

Great
Community comments coming soon!

Want to comment or judge submissions?

Partner today!

Judge Access
Submit Ratings

1- Did not do


2- Little evidence


3- Some requirements met


4- Most requirements met


5- All requirements met

Criteria One:

​

1- Did not do


2- Little evidence


3- Some requirements met


4- Most requirements met


5- All requirements met

Criteria Two:

​

1- Did not do


2- Little evidence


3- Some requirements met


4- Most requirements met


5- All requirements met

Criteria Three:

​

1- Did not do


2- Little evidence


3- Some requirements met


4- Most requirements met


5- All requirements met

Criteria Four:

​

1- Did not do


2- Little evidence


3- Some requirements met


4- Most requirements met


5- All requirements met

Criteria Five:

​

Total Rating:

1

Thanks for contributing to the growth of young innovators!

bottom of page