top of page
View All Pitches
Global Conflict

Architects

00
00
$0.00 raised of $0.00 goal

Users get 3 votes to give out per competition.

Success Message

Failuer Message

Livestream
Location

Kansas City Metro

Missouri

United States

​

City:

State:

Country:

School or Organization:

Competition Brief

​

About

The Architects: Global Conflict: Allan D, Grant E

Problem

Our subject matter expert, Mark Adams, the educational director of Truman Library, challenged us to determine whether or not increasing global awareness leads to an increase in global conflict.

Solution

We researched the United States' role in causing the current Ukranian war and we are creating a website that compares and contrasts our relations with Russia since WWI. We are also making a series of maps that will show the Russian boundaries and how over time, they went from allies to enemies.

Audience | Target Market

​

Learning Outcomes  |  Community Impact

Our audience will learn about the relationship between Russia and the US over the years.

Next Steps

We still need to complete the website.

 Reflection  |  Other Info

We've worked really well together. WE've been challenged with only having two people on our team and we've challenged ourselves to do more work.

Resource  |  Support Needs

We only ask that people attend our showcase on June 29 from 9:30-10:30 and 12:00-1:00. Business partners interested in working with our students on future projects, please contact our Director of Community Partnerships, Jake Wingo, at jake.wingo@raypec.org.

Special message...
Architects
Comments

From our partners.

New Comment

Comment here

Thanks for your submission. Your comment is awaiting approval from the educator

Comments

---

7/3/25, 3:32 PM

You did an excellent job with your pitch, well done!

Comments

---

7/3/25, 1:24 PM

Fantastic work on your pitch, "John James"! Keep up the great effort!

Comments

---

7/3/25, 1:35 AM

Great work, keep it up!

Comments

---

7/2/25, 11:40 PM

Great work, Evan! Keep it up!

Comments

---

7/2/25, 11:33 PM

Great work on your pitch, Likith! Keep it up!

Comments

---

7/2/25, 11:25 PM

Great work on your pitch, Aiden Ford!

Comments

---

7/2/25, 10:24 PM

Certainly! Here's a rephrased version of the feedback: "Great job on your video! It's clear that you've put a lot of effort into your pitch. Keep up the good work and continue to refine your ideas. I'm excited to see how you develop your concepts further!"

Comments

---

7/2/25, 8:27 PM

Great job

Comments

---

7/2/25, 8:04 PM

Thank you for sharing your pitch, "John James." I appreciate your enthusiasm and passion for dogs, as well as your creative approach to promoting them. Your idea of using videos and social media to highlight the positive aspects of having dogs is a strong strategy, and it's clear you have a good understanding of your target audience. To enhance your pitch, consider focusing on how you can present a balanced view that celebrates dogs without comparing them negatively to other animals. This approach might help you reach an even wider audience who appreciate all pets. Additionally, think about how you could use storytelling to capture the unique qualities of dogs that have personally impacted your life. Keep up the great work, and continue sharing your love for dogs with the world!

Comments

---

7/2/25, 7:50 PM

"Great work on your pitch, Aqil Khan!"

Comments

---

7/2/25, 5:19 PM

Cats are amazing animals! Next time, try and edit the "um"'s and "uh"s out to make the video flow a little smoother. Great job!

Comments

---

7/2/25, 4:53 PM

Good work
Community comments coming soon!

Want to comment or judge submissions?

Partner today!

Judge Access
Submit Ratings

1- Did not do


2- Little evidence


3- Some requirements met


4- Most requirements met


5- All requirements met

Criteria One:

​

1- Did not do


2- Little evidence


3- Some requirements met


4- Most requirements met


5- All requirements met

Criteria Two:

​

1- Did not do


2- Little evidence


3- Some requirements met


4- Most requirements met


5- All requirements met

Criteria Three:

​

1- Did not do


2- Little evidence


3- Some requirements met


4- Most requirements met


5- All requirements met

Criteria Four:

​

1- Did not do


2- Little evidence


3- Some requirements met


4- Most requirements met


5- All requirements met

Criteria Five:

​

Total Rating:

1

Thanks for contributing to the growth of young innovators!

bottom of page