top of page
​

​

00
00
$0.00 raised of $0.00 goal

This is one amazing pitch! Contact the competition host for details.

Success Message

Failuer Message

Livestream
Location

​

​

​

J.C Harmon

City:

State:

Country:

School or Organization:

Competition Brief

Welcome to the spirited and engaging pitch competition, "Why Dogs Are Better Than Cats!"—where pet enthusiasts and debaters alike gather to champion the virtues of man's best friend. Participants from all walks of life will take center stage to present compelling arguments, heartwarming stories, and scientific evidence that highlight the unparalleled loyalty, intelligence, and companionship that dogs offer. With a playful yet passionate atmosphere, the event promises to be a delightful blend of facts and fun, inviting audience members to join in the spirited discussion. Whether you're a devoted dog lover or a curious cat aficionado, this competition is sure to spark lively conversations and perhaps even sway a few opinions along the way. Let the best tail-wagger win!

About

​

Problem

​

Solution

​

Audience | Target Market

​

Learning Outcomes  |  Community Impact

​

Next Steps

​

 Reflection  |  Other Info

​

Resource  |  Support Needs

​

Special message...
Comments

From our partners.

New Comment

Comment here

Thanks for your submission. Your comment is awaiting approval from the educator

Comments

---

7/24/25, 11:11 AM

Good Job

Comments

---

7/24/25, 10:39 AM

Great start with your pitch titled "teem"! Your creativity has potential, and refining your responses will enhance clarity. Consider exploring careers as a Marketing Specialist, Content Creator, or Business Development Manager. Pursuing fields like Communication Studies or Business Administration could further develop your skills. Keep working on expressing your ideas clearly, as this will strengthen your pitch and help you excel in these areas. Your dedication is promising, and continued effort will lead to success.

Comments

---

7/24/25, 9:35 AM

eruio

Comments

---

7/23/25, 2:10 PM

skjskdjk

Comments

---

7/23/25, 11:25 AM

nice

Comments

---

7/21/25, 4:03 PM

nice

Comments

---

7/21/25, 3:44 PM

Your exploration into usability testing is a great start. It’s important to identify problems and propose thoughtful solutions. Consider careers in UX design, software testing, or product management, which require skills in problem-solving and analysis. Further studies in computer science or human-computer interaction could enhance your expertise. Keep refining your approach and enjoy the learning process. Your enthusiasm is a valuable asset as you make adjustments and evaluate impacts.

Comments

---

7/20/25, 4:32 PM

Testing with 1.25 backer contribution.

Comments

---

7/19/25, 9:21 AM

Your pitch for "Teamm Ruchika" is creative and impactful. Focusing on making science resources accessible is a great initiative, and your enthusiasm for fun learning is infectious. Consider careers like Science Educator, Educational Content Developer, or Community Outreach Coordinator. Pursuing studies in Science Communication or Educational Technology could enhance your project. Keep gathering innovative ideas to engage science enthusiasts and ensure an enriching learning experience. Your passion for making learning enjoyable is commendable!

Comments

---

7/17/25, 5:40 AM

nice

Comments

---

7/16/25, 7:38 AM

Testing reject pitch function. Test only.

Comments

---

7/16/25, 5:06 AM

Great
Community comments coming soon!

Want to comment or judge submissions?

Partner today!

Judge Access
Submit Ratings

1- Did not do


2- Little evidence


3- Some requirements met


4- Most requirements met


5- All requirements met

Criteria One:

​

1- Did not do


2- Little evidence


3- Some requirements met


4- Most requirements met


5- All requirements met

Criteria Two:

​

1- Did not do


2- Little evidence


3- Some requirements met


4- Most requirements met


5- All requirements met

Criteria Three:

​

1- Did not do


2- Little evidence


3- Some requirements met


4- Most requirements met


5- All requirements met

Criteria Four:

​

1- Did not do


2- Little evidence


3- Some requirements met


4- Most requirements met


5- All requirements met

Criteria Five:

​

Total Rating:

1

Thanks for contributing to the growth of young innovators!

bottom of page